varargs in lambda functions in Python

Each Answer to this Q is separated by one/two green lines.

Is it possible a lambda function to have variable number of arguments?
For example, I want to write a metaclass, which creates a method for every method of some other class and this newly created method returns the opposite value of the original method and has the same number of arguments.
And I want to do this with lambda function. How to pass the arguments? Is it possible?

class Negate(type):
    def __new__(mcs, name, bases, _dict):
        extended_dict = _dict.copy()
        for (k, v) in _dict.items():
            if hasattr(v, '__call__'):
                extended_dict["not_" + k] = lambda s, *args, **kw:  not v(s, *args, **kw)
        return type.__new__(mcs, name, bases, extended_dict)

class P(metaclass=Negate):
    def __init__(self, a):
        self.a = a

    def yes(self):
        return True

    def maybe(self, you_can_chose):
        return you_can_chose

But the result is totally wrong:

>>>p = P(0)
>>>p.yes()
True
>>>p.not_yes()     # should be False
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<pyshell#150>", line 1, in <module>
    p.not_yes()
  File "C:\Users\Desktop\p.py", line 51, in <lambda>
    extended_dict["not_" + k] = lambda s, *args, **kw:  not v(s, *args, **kw)
TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 2 positional arguments (1 given)
>>>p.maybe(True)
True
>>>p.not_maybe(True)     #should be False
True

There is no problem using varargs in lambda functions. The issue here is different:

The problem is that the the lambda refrences the loop variable v. But by the time the lambda is called, the value of v has changed and the lambda calls the wrong function. This is always something to watch out for when you define a lambda in a loop.

You can fix this by creating an additional function which will hold the value of v in a closure:

def create_not_function(v):
    return lambda s, *args, **kw:  not v(s, *args, **kw)

for (k, v) in _dict.items():
    if hasattr(v, '__call__'):
        extended_dict["not_" + k] = create_not_function(v)

Yes.

>>> l = lambda *x: print(x)
>>> l(1,2,3)
(1, 2, 3)


The answers/resolutions are collected from stackoverflow, are licensed under cc by-sa 2.5 , cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0 .