Are there functions for conversion between different coordinate systems?

For example, Matlab has `[rho,phi] = cart2pol(x,y)` for conversion from cartesian to polar coordinates. Seems like it should be in numpy or scipy.

Using numpy, you can define the following:

``````import numpy as np

def cart2pol(x, y):
rho = np.sqrt(x**2 + y**2)
phi = np.arctan2(y, x)
return(rho, phi)

def pol2cart(rho, phi):
x = rho * np.cos(phi)
y = rho * np.sin(phi)
return(x, y)
``````

The existing answers can be simplified:

``````from numpy import exp, abs, angle

def polar2z(r,theta):
return r * exp( 1j * theta )

def z2polar(z):
return ( abs(z), angle(z) )
``````

Or even:

``````polar2z = lambda r,?: r * exp( 1j * ? )
z2polar = lambda z: ( abs(z), angle(z) )
``````

Note these also work on arrays!

``````rS, thetaS = z2polar( [z1,z2,z3] )
zS = polar2z( rS, thetaS )
``````

You can use the cmath module.

If the number is converted to a complex format, then it becomes easier to just call the polar method on the number.

``````import cmath
input_num = complex(1, 2) # stored as 1+2j
r, phi = cmath.polar(input_num)
``````

If you can’t find it in numpy or scipy, here are a couple of quick functions and a point class:

``````import math

def rect(r, theta):
"""theta in degrees

returns tuple; (float, float); (x,y)
"""
x = r * math.cos(math.radians(theta))
y = r * math.sin(math.radians(theta))
return x,y

def polar(x, y):
"""returns r, theta(degrees)
"""
r = (x ** 2 + y ** 2) ** .5
theta = math.degrees(math.atan2(y,x))
return r, theta

class Point(object):
def __init__(self, x=None, y=None, r=None, theta=None):
"""x and y or r and theta(degrees)
"""
if x and y:
self.c_polar(x, y)
elif r and theta:
self.c_rect(r, theta)
else:
raise ValueError('Must specify x and y or r and theta')
def c_polar(self, x, y, f = polar):
self._x = x
self._y = y
self._r, self._theta = f(self._x, self._y)
def c_rect(self, r, theta, f = rect):
"""theta in degrees
"""
self._r = r
self._theta = theta
self._x, self._y = f(self._r, self._theta)
def setx(self, x):
self.c_polar(x, self._y)
def getx(self):
return self._x
x = property(fget = getx, fset = setx)
def sety(self, y):
self.c_polar(self._x, y)
def gety(self):
return self._y
y = property(fget = gety, fset = sety)
def setxy(self, x, y):
self.c_polar(x, y)
def getxy(self):
return self._x, self._y
xy = property(fget = getxy, fset = setxy)
def setr(self, r):
self.c_rect(r, self._theta)
def getr(self):
return self._r
r = property(fget = getr, fset = setr)
def settheta(self, theta):
"""theta in degrees
"""
self.c_rect(self._r, theta)
def gettheta(self):
return self._theta
theta = property(fget = gettheta, fset = settheta)
def set_r_theta(self, r, theta):
"""theta in degrees
"""
self.c_rect(r, theta)
def get_r_theta(self):
return self._r, self._theta
r_theta = property(fget = get_r_theta, fset = set_r_theta)
def __str__(self):
return '({},{})'.format(self._x, self._y)
``````

There is a better way to write a method to convert from Cartesian to polar coordinates; here it is:

``````import numpy as np
def polar(x, y) -> tuple:
"""returns rho, theta (degrees)"""
return np.hypot(x, y), np.degrees(np.arctan2(y, x))
``````

If your coordinates are stored as complex numbers you can use cmath

In case, like me, you’re trying to control a robot that accepts a speed and heading value based off of a joystick value, use this instead (it converts the radians to degrees:

``````def cart2pol(x, y):
rho = np.sqrt(x**2 + y**2)
phi = np.arctan2(y, x)
return(rho, math.degrees(phi))
``````

Mix of all the above answers which suits me:

``````import numpy as np

def pol2cart(r,theta):
'''
Parameters:
- r: float, vector amplitude
- theta: float, vector angle
Returns:
- x: float, x coord. of vector end
- y: float, y coord. of vector end
'''

z = r * np.exp(1j * theta)
x, y = z.real, z.imag

return x, y

def cart2pol(x, y):
'''
Parameters:
- x: float, x coord. of vector end
- y: float, y coord. of vector end
Returns:
- r: float, vector amplitude
- theta: float, vector angle
'''

z = x + y * 1j
r,theta = np.abs(z), np.angle(z)

return r,theta
``````

Thinking about it in general, I would strongly consider hiding coordinate system behind well-designed abstraction. Quoting Uncle Bob and his book:

``````class Point(object)
def setCartesian(self, x, y)
def setPolar(self, rho, theta)
def getX(self)
def getY(self)
def getRho(self)
def setTheta(self)
``````

With interface like that any user of Point class may choose convenient representation, no explicit conversions will be performed. All this ugly sines, cosines etc. will be hidden in one place. Point class. Only place where you should care which representation is used in computer memory.